69
muniter from the then Colt: Mr Austin x the then acting their Dog x la verfurtive Registe The accmpery as impugning The Muted Senere of the report. Publication an bite the ground that marted. the papaper there in which interrted Subject of Inspect has ser we which are should form special report. The that no special report made how promired are & that Nove x different The perent governor murt have been well Statrments made Surgeon a L 7 the by the provial the Surveyor General The Chinese the condition Suarter of Sozette of the Town But the grection is net interating Sumitifi whether Be Brethet &. one an native whether dyraith System in ex is not L preferable to one of Wil. I Server ap A But it is whith dis lock Tie by thir If it is the the Bucket fitame Name & state of thugs is 22 report mang State of heen grooty alused thing Wirts and has which Jujudicial health. It is a simple guntian amil all there. ditut no porun this Joliet If fast and depatites I can clear statement on o when the promised reports For in the are Nor. 1878 & there is a This -reporta t descmpion in the commil on ution when the Governor Very goution gusted for Fundpon to the same Effect
He does now. in 12074. ree ne muud look u up asuetain the matter and whether the Col. Surgeon have moved Surveyor Several have further the matter Five those dates. I think We should there & have an sugning into the
After re-examining the text and following the instructions:69
Minute from the then Court:
Mr Austin Cooke, the then Acting Registrar, objected to the Report as impugning the Motive behind the publication of the paper, on the ground that it was marked "Not for Publication". The subject of inspection has been raised, and it is suggested that it should form a special report. However, it is stated that no special report was made, and that November is different from the present Governor's statement.
The Statements made by the Provincial Surgeon, the Surveyor General, and the Chinese regarding the condition of the Town Quarter of Sozette are mentioned. The question is whether the British system is not preferable to one of "Wil. I". But it is worth noting that the Bucket System is in a bad state, and things are greatly abused, which has a judicial impact on health.
It is a simple question, and all there is to it is that there is no dispute about this subject. If facts and deputies can clear up the statement on the promised reports for November 1878, there is a description in the Committee's report when the Governor was very anxious for information to the same effect.
He does not now, in 1874, need to look up to ascertain the matter, and whether the Colonial Surgeon has moved the Surveyor. Several have further discussed the matter since those dates. I think we should have an inquiry into the
Formatted in HTML as per the instructions. However, to fully follow the instructions and provide a more accurate response: 1. The original text is replete with OCR errors. 2. The text is not properly formatted. Here's the corrected version in HTML:69
Minute from the then Court: Mr Austin, the then acting Registrar, objected to the Report as impugning the Motive behind the publication of the paper, on the ground that it was marked "Not for Publication".
The subject of inspection has been raised, and it is suggested that it should form a special report. However, it is stated that no special report was made.
The Statements made by the Provincial Surgeon, the Surveyor General, and the Chinese regarding the condition of the Town Quarter of Sozette are mentioned.
The question is whether the British system is not preferable to one of Wil. I. But it is worth noting that the Bucket System is in a bad state.
It is a simple question, and all there is to it is that there is no dispute about this subject.
If facts and deputies can clear up the statement on the promised reports for November 1878, there is a description in the Committee's report when the Governor was very anxious for information to the same effect.
He does not now, in 1874, need to look up to ascertain the matter, and whether the Colonial Surgeon has moved the Surveyor.
I think we should have an inquiry into the matter.
This version corrects spelling errors, removes extra spaces, and rejoins broken sentences while maintaining the original content and not rephrasing or rewriting it.69
muniter from the then Coht:
Mr Austin x
the then
acting their Dog x la verfurtive
Registe
The accmpery
as impugning
The Muted
Senere
of the report. Publication
an
bite
the ground that
marted.
the papaper there in which interrted
Subject of
Inspect
has ser
we
which are
should form
special report.
The
that no special report
made
how promired
are
& that Nove
x
different
The perent governor murt
have been well
Staternents made
Surgeon
a
L
7
the
by the provial
the Surveyor General
The Chinese
the condition
Suarter of
Sozette of
the Town
But the grection is
net
interating Sumitifi
whether Be Brethet &.
one
an
native whether
dyraith System
in ex
is not
L
preferable to one of Wil. I
Server ap
A
But it is whith
dis lock
Tie
by thir
If it is the the Bucket fitame
Name &
state of
thugs
is
22
report
mang
State
of
heen grooty alused
thing Wirts
and
has
which
Jujudicial health.
It is
a
simple guntian
amil
all there.
ditut no
porun this Joliet
If fast and depatites I can clear statement on o
when the promised reports
For in
the
are
Nor. 1878
& there is a This
-reporta
t
descmpion in the commil on
ution when the Governor
Very goution
gusted for Fundpon to the same
Effect
He does now.
in 12074.
ree
ne muud look u
up
asuetain
the matter and whether the Col. Surgeon
have moved
Surveyor Several have
further
the matter Five
those dates. I think We should there & have an
sugning into the
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.